- USDT(TRC-20)
- $0.0
If youâve been on TikTok over the past few days, youâve no doubt witnessed your favorite creators saying their goodbyes and telling you where you can find them next. With an impending ban on the social media app set to take effect in the U.S. on Sunday, it seems like thereâs little the platformâs users can do except wait and hope that the Supreme Court, which heard arguments from both TikTokâs lawyers and the Justice Department on Friday, strikes it down.
However, with TikTok now threatening to shut down altogether (though the ban would simply keep it from being listed on app stores, the company proposed taking the nuclear option) and Americans fleeing to another Chinese app as a replacement-slash-act of protest, various government officialsâindependent of the Supreme Courtâare looking to change course.
From the outside, it all seems like a big game of chicken. First, the U.S. governmentâaiming either to protect your data and national security (as it claims) or simply to pump up the American tech industry by disrupting the popular China-backed platformâdemanded TikTok parent ByteDance sell the service to an American company. Then, ByteDance, not wanting to lose its cash cow, called the U.S.'s bluff and refused to sell. Now, American TikTokers are showing their reluctance to use homegrown replacements like Instagram Reels, leaving the government with a few choices: It can pursue the ban and hope the public or ByteDance gets on board, or it can try to salvage the situation and delay or nix the ban so as to not further upset voters and drive them into the arms of other Chinese apps.
While it's too soon to predict exactly what will happen, working to avoid the Sunday shutdown is exactly what a few key power players are doing.
One of the most surprising people said to be changing their mind about a TikTok ban is President Biden, who signed it into law and has only a few days remaining in his term. Speaking to NBC News, âthree people familiar with the discussionsâ indicated the Biden administration is currently working on ways to keep TikTok from going dark on Sunday.
âAmericans shouldnât expect to see TikTok suddenly banned on Sunday,â an administration official told the outlet, saying that Bidenâs team is âexploring optionsâ to keep that from happening when the law goes into effect on Jan. 19. Itâs all a bit vagueâcertainly a ban is exactly what we were expectingâbut a White House official did clarify that the options being considered wouldnât include deferring enforcement of the ban, as the administration doesnât âbelieve we have the authority to do that.â
Incoming President Trump also now opposes the ban, but may show less reluctance to act. The Washington Post reports Trump is considering penning an executive order that would delay the banâs enforcement by 60 to 90 days. Such an extreme measure would perhaps be Trumpâs only play here, as the ban is set to go into effect one day before he takes office. Trump's stance marks a similar change in attitude to President Biden's: During his first term, Trump signed an executive order that attempted to force TikTok to shut down operations in the U.S., something the company avoided by partnering with U.S.-based company Oracle to protect the data of American users.
Realistically, the most stable way to get the ban struck down, save by the Supreme Court, would be for the members of congress who voted for it to change their minds. The biggest governmental backswing weâve seen on the TikTok ban so farâor at least the biggest one that doesnât rely on hearsay and anonymous sourcesâwould be a new bill from Democratic Senator Ed Markey. Introduced this week, Markey's bill would extend the deadline for the ban by 270 days, giving TikTok more time to find a buyer or provide lawmakers an opportunity to reevaluate the situation.
âIn four days, TikTok goes dark,â Markey said while introducing the legislation. âMy bill just says, we need more time.â
As part of his justification for the bill, Markey argued that TikTok has been âcentral to our economy and the way in which we communicate,â arguing that the communities its creators and small businesses have established there âcannot be replicated on another app.â
âWe need time to have a deeper conversation about how to address the national security risks caused by Bytedanceâs ownership of TikTok.â Markey continued. âWe need time to understand the banâs implication on TikTokâs creators and users.â
Perhaps most exciting for those opposed the ban, Markey also added âWe need time to consider alternative ideas,â hinting at a future where Congress abandons ideas of a ban altogether.
This bill also marks something of a change in attitude from Markey, who originally spoke out against banning the platform but nonetheless voted for the current ban anywayâalthough it should be noted that the ban was included in a bill also providing aid to Ukraine and Israel.
For his part, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed to continue "working to keep TikTok alive."
Any legislative action to prevent a shutdown would need to move quickly, assuming the Supreme Court upholds the ban, but while both the executive and legislative branches are considering backpedaling on the ban across party lines, some in government are sticking to their original decision.
âThey had all the time in the world,â Republican Senator Rick Scott said. âTheyâve had an opportunity to sell it to make sure the Chinese government doesnât control it and they decided not to do that.â
For now, all eyes are still on the Supreme Court. Yet even if the judicial branch upholds the ban, it seems the game of chicken might ultimately end with TikTok continuing to operate as usual, and without a third party like Mark Zuckerberg's Meta or Microsoft holding the reins.
As we wait to see how things play out, Iâll join with the choir saying they would rather learn Mandarin than watch an Instagram Reel.
Full story here:
However, with TikTok now threatening to shut down altogether (though the ban would simply keep it from being listed on app stores, the company proposed taking the nuclear option) and Americans fleeing to another Chinese app as a replacement-slash-act of protest, various government officialsâindependent of the Supreme Courtâare looking to change course.
From the outside, it all seems like a big game of chicken. First, the U.S. governmentâaiming either to protect your data and national security (as it claims) or simply to pump up the American tech industry by disrupting the popular China-backed platformâdemanded TikTok parent ByteDance sell the service to an American company. Then, ByteDance, not wanting to lose its cash cow, called the U.S.'s bluff and refused to sell. Now, American TikTokers are showing their reluctance to use homegrown replacements like Instagram Reels, leaving the government with a few choices: It can pursue the ban and hope the public or ByteDance gets on board, or it can try to salvage the situation and delay or nix the ban so as to not further upset voters and drive them into the arms of other Chinese apps.
While it's too soon to predict exactly what will happen, working to avoid the Sunday shutdown is exactly what a few key power players are doing.
Biden and Trump have both changed their stances
One of the most surprising people said to be changing their mind about a TikTok ban is President Biden, who signed it into law and has only a few days remaining in his term. Speaking to NBC News, âthree people familiar with the discussionsâ indicated the Biden administration is currently working on ways to keep TikTok from going dark on Sunday.
âAmericans shouldnât expect to see TikTok suddenly banned on Sunday,â an administration official told the outlet, saying that Bidenâs team is âexploring optionsâ to keep that from happening when the law goes into effect on Jan. 19. Itâs all a bit vagueâcertainly a ban is exactly what we were expectingâbut a White House official did clarify that the options being considered wouldnât include deferring enforcement of the ban, as the administration doesnât âbelieve we have the authority to do that.â
Incoming President Trump also now opposes the ban, but may show less reluctance to act. The Washington Post reports Trump is considering penning an executive order that would delay the banâs enforcement by 60 to 90 days. Such an extreme measure would perhaps be Trumpâs only play here, as the ban is set to go into effect one day before he takes office. Trump's stance marks a similar change in attitude to President Biden's: During his first term, Trump signed an executive order that attempted to force TikTok to shut down operations in the U.S., something the company avoided by partnering with U.S.-based company Oracle to protect the data of American users.
A bill to save TikTok (for now)
Realistically, the most stable way to get the ban struck down, save by the Supreme Court, would be for the members of congress who voted for it to change their minds. The biggest governmental backswing weâve seen on the TikTok ban so farâor at least the biggest one that doesnât rely on hearsay and anonymous sourcesâwould be a new bill from Democratic Senator Ed Markey. Introduced this week, Markey's bill would extend the deadline for the ban by 270 days, giving TikTok more time to find a buyer or provide lawmakers an opportunity to reevaluate the situation.
âIn four days, TikTok goes dark,â Markey said while introducing the legislation. âMy bill just says, we need more time.â
As part of his justification for the bill, Markey argued that TikTok has been âcentral to our economy and the way in which we communicate,â arguing that the communities its creators and small businesses have established there âcannot be replicated on another app.â
âWe need time to have a deeper conversation about how to address the national security risks caused by Bytedanceâs ownership of TikTok.â Markey continued. âWe need time to understand the banâs implication on TikTokâs creators and users.â
Perhaps most exciting for those opposed the ban, Markey also added âWe need time to consider alternative ideas,â hinting at a future where Congress abandons ideas of a ban altogether.
This bill also marks something of a change in attitude from Markey, who originally spoke out against banning the platform but nonetheless voted for the current ban anywayâalthough it should be noted that the ban was included in a bill also providing aid to Ukraine and Israel.
For his part, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed to continue "working to keep TikTok alive."
Support for the ban remains
Any legislative action to prevent a shutdown would need to move quickly, assuming the Supreme Court upholds the ban, but while both the executive and legislative branches are considering backpedaling on the ban across party lines, some in government are sticking to their original decision.
âThey had all the time in the world,â Republican Senator Rick Scott said. âTheyâve had an opportunity to sell it to make sure the Chinese government doesnât control it and they decided not to do that.â
For now, all eyes are still on the Supreme Court. Yet even if the judicial branch upholds the ban, it seems the game of chicken might ultimately end with TikTok continuing to operate as usual, and without a third party like Mark Zuckerberg's Meta or Microsoft holding the reins.
As we wait to see how things play out, Iâll join with the choir saying they would rather learn Mandarin than watch an Instagram Reel.
Full story here: