In a July 11 hearing, Judge Katherine Polk Failla expressed skepticism about Coinbaseās efforts to subpoena SEC Chair Gary Gensler in the ongoing SEC case against the cryptocurrency exchange.
As detailed by Inner City Press, the hearing showcased Coinbaseās persistent efforts to acquire Genslerās communications, including statements made before he became SEC Chair in 2021.
Judge Failla stated, āI understood from the SECās opening submission that this request includes a period before his Chairmanship. Youāll have a hard row to hoe on that. I find your arguments speculative.ā
Coinbaseās legal team argued that they could not obtain necessary information from the SEC, prompting them to include Genslerās pre-Chair communications to strengthen their fair notice defense. āEven the period when heād been Chair, they say no. We tried to engage with Mr. Gensler and the SEC, but theyāve refused to say he didnāt use his personal device to communicate about crypto.ā
However, Judge Failla dismissed this argument, stating, āI do not find that argument persuasive. Just keep that in mind.ā She urged Coinbaseās legal team to reconsider their approach, noting, āI think you should cut your losses and go to your second point.ā
Coinbase maintained that Genslerās unique role in shaping public understanding of cryptocurrency warranted the inclusion of his communications. In response, Judge Failla acknowledged the potential difficulty Coinbase faces.
The SECās legal representative, Jorge Tenreiro, argued against the subpoena, stating, āWhat they are asking for, from a public official, is incredibly intrusive. Officials have important duties. The cases look at the SECās actions, not the actions of one person. Before they ask us to pick up his personal phone, show us.ā
Tenreiro emphasized that Gensler is neither a fact witness nor an expert witness on the law, arguing that the subpoena should be quashed.
Coinbase countered by citing a case where the Ripple court ordered the discovery of communications from 19 custodians, including then-Chair Jay Clayton. However, Tenreiro noted that the issue of personal devices had already been addressed in the Ripple case.
In closing, Judge Failla directed Coinbase to proceed with a motion to compel, setting a deadline for further scheduling discussions with the SEC, to which the exchangeās lawyer confirmed, āCertainly.ā
The origins of this dispute trace back to June, when Coinbase requested documents and communications regarding Genslerās public comments on digital assets, platforms, and staking services from May 2021 to September 2023. Coinbaseās request also included 33 other demands for documents and communications concerning the SECās actions.
On June 28, the agency asked the court to quash the subpoena against Gensler, a motion that Coinbase responded to on July 3 by asserting the relevance of his personal communications to its fair notice defense.
The post Judge Criticizes Coinbaseās Attempt to Subpoena SEC Chair Gary Gensler appeared first on CryptoPotato.
As detailed by Inner City Press, the hearing showcased Coinbaseās persistent efforts to acquire Genslerās communications, including statements made before he became SEC Chair in 2021.
Judge Skeptical of Coinbaseās Subpoena
Judge Failla stated, āI understood from the SECās opening submission that this request includes a period before his Chairmanship. Youāll have a hard row to hoe on that. I find your arguments speculative.ā
Judge Failla: I understood from the SECās opening submission that this request includes a period before his Chairmanship. Youāll have a hard row to hoe on that. I find your arguments speculative.
Coinbaseās lawyer: Even the period when heād been Chair, they say no
ā Inner City Press (@innercitypress) July 11, 2024
Coinbaseās legal team argued that they could not obtain necessary information from the SEC, prompting them to include Genslerās pre-Chair communications to strengthen their fair notice defense. āEven the period when heād been Chair, they say no. We tried to engage with Mr. Gensler and the SEC, but theyāve refused to say he didnāt use his personal device to communicate about crypto.ā
However, Judge Failla dismissed this argument, stating, āI do not find that argument persuasive. Just keep that in mind.ā She urged Coinbaseās legal team to reconsider their approach, noting, āI think you should cut your losses and go to your second point.ā
Coinbase maintained that Genslerās unique role in shaping public understanding of cryptocurrency warranted the inclusion of his communications. In response, Judge Failla acknowledged the potential difficulty Coinbase faces.
Judge Failla: It does trouble me if youāve been stonewalled. Iām saddened to learn that there is another motion forthcoming from you. Iāll be here for these motions.
ā Inner City Press (@innercitypress) July 11, 2024
The SECās legal representative, Jorge Tenreiro, argued against the subpoena, stating, āWhat they are asking for, from a public official, is incredibly intrusive. Officials have important duties. The cases look at the SECās actions, not the actions of one person. Before they ask us to pick up his personal phone, show us.ā
Tenreiro emphasized that Gensler is neither a fact witness nor an expert witness on the law, arguing that the subpoena should be quashed.
Coinbase countered by citing a case where the Ripple court ordered the discovery of communications from 19 custodians, including then-Chair Jay Clayton. However, Tenreiro noted that the issue of personal devices had already been addressed in the Ripple case.
Judge Failla appeared sympathetic to the SECās position, remarking, āI do have strong views about the disproportionate burden of inquiry into Mr. Genslerās statements before he became chair.ā
Judge Directs Coinbase to File Motion to Compel
In closing, Judge Failla directed Coinbase to proceed with a motion to compel, setting a deadline for further scheduling discussions with the SEC, to which the exchangeās lawyer confirmed, āCertainly.ā
Judge Failla: You do not appear to be withdrawing the subpoena. Iād prefer you begin with a motion to compel.
Coinbaseās lawyer: Weāll be glad to proceed that way.
Judge: Make a schedule with the SEC, offline. Letter by Monday?
Coinbaseās lawyer: Certainly.
ā Inner City Press (@innercitypress) July 11, 2024
The origins of this dispute trace back to June, when Coinbase requested documents and communications regarding Genslerās public comments on digital assets, platforms, and staking services from May 2021 to September 2023. Coinbaseās request also included 33 other demands for documents and communications concerning the SECās actions.
On June 28, the agency asked the court to quash the subpoena against Gensler, a motion that Coinbase responded to on July 3 by asserting the relevance of his personal communications to its fair notice defense.
The post Judge Criticizes Coinbaseās Attempt to Subpoena SEC Chair Gary Gensler appeared first on CryptoPotato.