TL;DR
The legal confrontation between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has witnessed numerous developments as of late.
Most recently, the company filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority regarding a recent decision related to crypto exchange Binance. Last week, Judge Amy Jackson dismissed the regulatorās claims that secondary market sales of Binanceās BNB token constituted securities transactions.
Ripple seemingly intends to use that ruling in its favor. The firmās legal counsel, Michael Kellogg, argued that the recent magistratesā decision supports Rippleās case that its alleged illegal sales of XRP do not warrant āharsh remediesā as the agency claims.
Developments surrounding the longstanding lawsuit between the company and Americaās securities regulator have often reflected on XRPās market performance. The tokenās price headed north following the filed letter and remains slightly in the green on a daily scale. In comparison, other leading cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), have tanked substantially in the past 24 hours.
One of the major issues related to the caseās possible resolution is the size of Rippleās penalty. The SEC initially sought a staggering $2 billion fine, while the firm claimed the amount should not exceed $10 million.
Ripple compared the lawsuit with the one between the regulator and Terraform Labs, saying direct allegations of fraud were only evident in the one against the defunct crypto company.
Shortly after, the SEC softened its tone, proposing a $102.6 million penalty:
The post Important Ripple v SEC Update July 3 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
- Ripple uses a recent Binance ruling to argue against harsh penalties in their SEC lawsuit, citing regulatory uncertainty.
- The agency has reduced its proposed penalty from $2 billion to $102.6 million, while the company argues for a maximum fine of $10 million.
Ripple on the Move
The legal confrontation between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has witnessed numerous developments as of late.
Most recently, the company filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority regarding a recent decision related to crypto exchange Binance. Last week, Judge Amy Jackson dismissed the regulatorās claims that secondary market sales of Binanceās BNB token constituted securities transactions.
Ripple seemingly intends to use that ruling in its favor. The firmās legal counsel, Michael Kellogg, argued that the recent magistratesā decision supports Rippleās case that its alleged illegal sales of XRP do not warrant āharsh remediesā as the agency claims.
āThis observation supports Rippleās argument that providing clarity on the legality of the different types of sales of XRP was the most significant aspect of the Courtās summary judgment decisionā¦
The lack of regulatory clarity prior to that ruling, in turn, supports Rippleās position that the Courtās finding of a strict liability violation on some of Rippleās sales ā but far fewer than the SEC alleged were violations ā does not reflect reckless disregard for the law or warrant harsh remedies. And, of course, the SEC did not even allege recklessness as to Ripple in its Complaint,ā the letter reads.
Developments surrounding the longstanding lawsuit between the company and Americaās securities regulator have often reflected on XRPās market performance. The tokenās price headed north following the filed letter and remains slightly in the green on a daily scale. In comparison, other leading cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), have tanked substantially in the past 24 hours.
The Bone of Contention
One of the major issues related to the caseās possible resolution is the size of Rippleās penalty. The SEC initially sought a staggering $2 billion fine, while the firm claimed the amount should not exceed $10 million.
Ripple compared the lawsuit with the one between the regulator and Terraform Labs, saying direct allegations of fraud were only evident in the one against the defunct crypto company.
Shortly after, the SEC softened its tone, proposing a $102.6 million penalty:
āRipple avoids comparing the Terraform settlementās penalty to the gross profit of the violative conduct. That ratio ($420 million/$3.587 billion) is significantly higher: 11.7%. Applying it to the $876.3 million in gross profits, the SEC here asks the court to disgorge, which results in a much larger figure, a $102.6 million penalty, than the $10 million ceiling Ripple insists on.ā
The post Important Ripple v SEC Update July 3 appeared first on CryptoPotato.