Welcome to the Off-Shore Club

The #1 Social Engineering Project in the world since 2004 !

Important Notice:

✅UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY TO ACCESS ALL OFF-SHORE FORUMS✅

[New]Telegram Channel

In case our domain name changes, we advise you to subscribe to our new TG channel to always be aware of all events and updates -
https://t.me/rtmsechannel

OFF-SHORE Staff Announcement: Do NOT sell Drugs here AT ALL, in short we mean 1 Drug Post = Instant persistent ban on the legit network forums ! Want to know what it means, try and see !
Happy Hacking !


30% Bonus on ALL Wallet Deposit this week For example, if you deposit $1000, your RTM Balance will be $1000 + $300 advertising wallet that can be used to purchase eligible products and service on forums or request withdrawal. The limit deposit to get the 30% bonus is $10,000 for a $3000 Marketplace wallet balance Bonus.

Deposit Now and claim 30% more balance ! - BTC/LTC/XMR


Always use a Mixer to keep Maximum anonimity ! - BTC to BTC or BTC to XMR

💣Exploit CVE-2024-56702 - Linux Kernel BPF PTR_MAYBE_NULL Vulnerability

Gold

Maksim

Tactician
Staff member
Administrator
Instructor
USDT(TRC-20)
$450.0
CVE ID : CVE-2024-56702
Published : Dec. 28, 2024, 10:15 a.m. | 20 minutes ago
Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0]. Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL checks to be deleted, and accesses to such pointers potentially crashing the kernel. To fix this, mark raw_tp arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, and then special case the dereference and pointer arithmetic to permit it, and allow passing them into helpers/kfuncs; these exceptions are made for raw_tp programs only. Ensure that we don't do this when ref_obj_id > 0, as in that case this is an acquired object and doesn't need such adjustment. The reason we do mask_raw_tp_trusted_reg logic is because other will recheck in places whether the register is a trusted_reg, and then consider our register as untrusted when detecting the presence of the PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag. To allow safe dereference, we enable PROBE_MEM marking when we see loads into trusted pointers with PTR_MAYBE_NULL. While trusted raw_tp arguments can also be passed into helpers or kfuncs where such broken assumption may cause issues, a future patch set will tackle their case separately, as PTR_TO_BTF_ID (without PTR_TRUSTED) can already be passed into helpers and causes similar problems. Thus, they are left alone for now. It is possible that these checks also permit passing non-raw_tp args that are trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID with null marking. In such a case, allowing dereference when pointer is NULL expands allowed behavior, so won't regress existing programs, and the case of passing these into helpers is the same as above and will be dealt with later. Also update the failure case in tp_btf_nullable selftest to capture the new behavior, as the verifier will no longer cause an error when directly dereference a raw tracepoint argument marked as __nullable. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
Full story here:
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Friendly Disclaimer We do not host or store any files on our website except thread messages, most likely your DMCA content is being hosted on a third-party website and you need to contact them. Representatives of this site ("service") are not responsible for any content created by users and for accounts. The materials presented express only the opinions of their authors.
🚨 Do not get Ripped Off ! ⚖️ Deal with approved sellers or use RTM Escrow on Telegram
Gold
Mitalk.lat official Off Shore Club Chat


Gold

Panel Title #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Panel Title #2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Top