Welcome to the Off-Shore Club

The #1 Social Engineering Project in the world since 2004 !

Important Notice:

✅UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY TO ACCESS ALL OFF-SHORE FORUMS✅

[New]Telegram Channel

In case our domain name changes, we advise you to subscribe to our new TG channel to always be aware of all events and updates -
https://t.me/rtmsechannel

OFF-SHORE Staff Announcement: Do NOT sell Drugs here AT ALL, in short we mean 1 Drug Post = Instant persistent ban on the legit network forums ! Want to know what it means, try and see !
Happy Hacking !


30% Bonus on ALL Wallet Deposit this week For example, if you deposit $1000, your RTM Balance will be $1000 + $300 advertising wallet that can be used to purchase eligible products and service on forums or request withdrawal. The limit deposit to get the 30% bonus is $10,000 for a $3000 Marketplace wallet balance Bonus.

Deposit Now and claim 30% more balance ! - BTC/LTC/XMR


Always use a Mixer to keep Maximum anonimity ! - BTC to BTC or BTC to XMR

💣Exploit CVE-2024-54680 - Linux Kernel Samba SMB Client NetNS Reference Counting Vulnerability

Gold

Maksim

Tactician
Staff member
Administrator
Instructor
USDT(TRC-20)
$450.0
CVE ID : CVE-2024-54680
Published : Jan. 11, 2025, 1:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod Commit ef7134c7fc48 ("smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace.") fixed a netns UAF by manually enabled socket refcounting (sk->sk_net_refcnt=1 and sock_inuse_add(net, 1)). The reason the patch worked for that bug was because we now hold references to the netns (get_net_track() gets a ref internally) and they're properly released (internally, on __sk_destruct()), but only because sk->sk_net_refcnt was set. Problem: (this happens regardless of CONFIG_NET_NS_REFCNT_TRACKER and regardless if init_net or other) Setting sk->sk_net_refcnt=1 *manually* and *after* socket creation is not only out of cifs scope, but also technically wrong -- it's set conditionally based on user (=1) vs kernel (=0) sockets. And net/ implementations seem to base their user vs kernel space operations on it. e.g. upon TCP socket close, the TCP timers are not cleared because sk->sk_net_refcnt=1: (cf. commit 151c9c724d05 ("tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets")) net/ipv4/tcp.c: void tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) { lock_sock(sk); __tcp_close(sk, timeout); release_sock(sk); if (!sk->sk_net_refcnt) inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync(sk); sock_put(sk); } Which will throw a lockdep warning and then, as expected, deadlock on tcp_write_timer(). A way to reproduce this is by running the reproducer from ef7134c7fc48 and then 'rmmod cifs'. A few seconds later, the deadlock/lockdep warning shows up. Fix: We shouldn't mess with socket internals ourselves, so do not set sk_net_refcnt manually. Also change __sock_create() to sock_create_kern() for explicitness. As for non-init_net network namespaces, we deal with it the best way we can -- hold an extra netns reference for server->ssocket and drop it when it's released. This ensures that the netns still exists whenever we need to create/destroy server->ssocket, but is not directly tied to it.
Severity: 0.0 | NA
Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...
Full story here:
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Friendly Disclaimer We do not host or store any files on our website except thread messages, most likely your DMCA content is being hosted on a third-party website and you need to contact them. Representatives of this site ("service") are not responsible for any content created by users and for accounts. The materials presented express only the opinions of their authors.
🚨 Do not get Ripped Off ! ⚖️ Deal with approved sellers or use RTM Escrow on Telegram
Gold
Mitalk.lat official Off Shore Club Chat


Gold

Panel Title #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Panel Title #2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Top